Current problem reports assigned to you

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 17:15, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:03:27 GMT, FreeBSD bugmaster  
> <bugmaster at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > Current FreeBSD problem reports
> > Critical problems
> > Serious problems
> >
> > S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > o [2004/08/12] ports/70343 gnome       libgtkhtml won't build
> 
> Do anyone know what's wrong with this? I don't have any problem when I  
> built it.
> 
> > o [2004/08/16] ports/70520 gnome       packaged version of epiphany has  
> > issues/d
> 
> Dunno, will have to ask him what's wrong with his build via ports. Mix  
> with ports and packages are not recommend, however.

These two can probably be closed.  His system has some problems.  None
of these problems appear in a clean build, or a package install on a
clean system off of the GNOME Tinderbox.

> 
> > 2 problems total.
> >
> > Non-critical problems
> >
> > S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > o [2002/06/17] ports/39390 gnome       Make graphics/imlib not depend  
> > upon GTK+
> 
> It has been sitting for more than two years, I think it's time to close  
> this PR. Agree? No reply, I will close it with my gut.

Agree.

> 
> > o [2004/01/04] ports/60876 gnome       x11/gdm2 sets overly-high display  
> > frequen
> 
> I think, this PR can be close with tell him to update his FreeBSD and  
> GNOME2. Also, if his problem still exists, then contract to  
> gnome at FreeBSD.org. Agree?

Yep.

> 
> > o [2004/04/07] ports/65296 gnome       noise with esd a day later  
> > (audio/esound)
> 
> Dunno.

This is unreproduceable to me.  I would say find out if it still happens
with 0.2.35, and if so, pursue it with the esound developers and/or the
FreeBSD sound people.

> 
> > o [2004/06/04] ports/67552 gnome       Teach fontconfig about gs fonts
> 
> What do anyone think of this?

I think this is pending some other updates.  You might want to ask the
author about it.  I'm not opposed to doing what he suggests as long as X
is in line with whatever we decide.

> 
> > o [2004/06/15] ports/67970 gnome       ports textproc/libxml,  
> > textproc/libxslt:
> 
> Well.......I personal don't care about this since pkgconfig is mofo small.  
> :-P I bet this one is going to take forever unless someone step in and  
> create the patch(es).

I don't see why we need to get anymore clever with pkgconfig.  It is
small, and is generally needed on any desktop system.

> 
> > o [2004/07/07] ports/68747 gnome       [patch] upgrade print/freetype2
> 
> How is it so far with the test? Does it still mess up the pretty font or  
> what? All I know is that future xorg will need the new freetype2 or it  
> can't be build.

This needs to be suspended.  The update to 2.1.9 can't happen right now
since it breaks too many important ports.  X.Org was fixed to need 2.1.4
or higher, so this is no longer an issue there.  I've tested the 2.1.9
update, and while rendering is better, the API changes make it
prohibitive right now.

> 
> > o [2004/07/09] ports/68879 gnome       [patch] update  
> > x11-toolkits/scintilla to
> 
> Dunno, will have to check it. I don't really know scintilla that much.  
> Since, it breaks with scite then one of us will need to check scite  
> website to see if there has any of update that works with new scintilla.
> 
> > o [2004/07/17] ports/69175 gnome       audio/esound: when the esound  
> > port is upg
> 
> Umm, will need to make the changes to get this port respect the etc/*.conf.

Yep.  This should be done.

> 
> > o [2004/08/03] ports/69937 gnome       [PATCH] www/mozilla: Work-around  
> > for Mozi
> 
> Someone will need to take a look at Mozilla CVS and create a patch for  
> this one. Or, wait until next Mozilla update.

I'll handle this.

Joe

> 
> > o [2004/08/11] ports/70289 gnome       graphics/dia : dia.xpm is not  
> > installed
> 
> I don't mind to check this, I will put dia.xpm in either share/gnome/dia/  
> or share/gnome/pixmaps/ instead.
> 
> 
> I just input the comments above to see if anyone agree. Also, I will like  
> to see us to reduce all of those PRs. ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Mezz
> 
> > 10 problems total.
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040816/896b9b74/attachment.bin