ports/58840: [PATCH] exclude possibly unrequireddependenciesfrom x11/gnome2

[Khairil Yusof]

On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 15:28, Khairil Yusof wrote:

> Why do you need options for this?

Apologies if my email sounded offencive.

I read what I wrote again. It may have come across as rude (in the
context of an email). It wasn't my intention, should have put a smiley
in there somewhere.

A good point as is being discussed is, not a whole bunch of ifdefs but a
nice ncurses based screen like that of php4.

I still however agree that the gnome2 meta-port should stick with the
gnome project specs, and that it is trivial to remove unwanted ports
from the meta-port.

--
"Optimized, readable, on time; Pick any two." 

FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT i386 
8:29PM up 1 day, 21:14, 2 users, load averages: 0.38, 0.41, 0.32
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20031103/f2a1482b/attachment.bin