Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at FreeBSD.org
Mon Apr 14 12:12:48 PDT 2003
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 15:09, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that every concept of "WITHOUT_OPTIMIZE" added in
> rev.1.136 of ports/www/mozilla/Makefile is wrong. No port
> should force optimisation level on user - we have CFLAGS
> for this and each user should be able to select any
> performance/stability ratio he wants.
>
> IMO relevant part of 1.136 should be backed out, or possibly
> turned into WITH_OPTIMIZED instead.
It took me a long time to turn this on. Many people asked for it, and
extensive tests showed it helped without any adverse affects. I finally
borrowed the concept from www/phoenix.
I'm always open to change. What say you all? Should this be reverted?
Turned into WITH_MOZILLA_OPTIMIZE?
Joe
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Maxim
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus at FreeBSD.org
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20030414/40220fda/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list