Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user

Joe Marcus Clarke marcus at FreeBSD.org
Mon Apr 14 12:12:48 PDT 2003


On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 15:09, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think that every concept of "WITHOUT_OPTIMIZE" added in
> rev.1.136 of ports/www/mozilla/Makefile is wrong. No port
> should force optimisation level on user - we have CFLAGS
> for this and each user should be able to select any
> performance/stability ratio he wants.
> 
> IMO relevant part of 1.136 should be backed out, or possibly
> turned into WITH_OPTIMIZED instead.

It took me a long time to turn this on.  Many people asked for it, and
extensive tests showed it helped without any adverse affects.  I finally
borrowed the concept from www/phoenix.

I'm always open to change.  What say you all?  Should this be reverted? 
Turned into WITH_MOZILLA_OPTIMIZE?

Joe

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Maxim
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	marcus at FreeBSD.org
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20030414/40220fda/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list