got(1) in base (was: Re: gitup(1) in base)

[Christian Weisgerber]

On 2021-02-08, "Osipov, Michael (LDA IT PLM)" <michael.osipov at siemens.com> wrote:

> I'd like to raise the question whether gitup(1) [1] can be included in 
> base?

Where are we with the inclusion of got(1) [1] in base?

* It has reached a good maturity level
* Stefan Sperling reacts quite fast to issues
* It makes the base system complete and suitably replaces svnlite
* It does not impose the huge complexity and dependency hierarchy of the 
original Git client on admins and other non-developers

The original hold-up appears to have been an ex nihilo requirement
that it must be Capsicum-ized.  Somebody was working on this, but
has gone silent.

gitup is not Capsicum-ized either.


[1] https://gameoftrees.org/

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy at mips.inka.de