Reality-checking the github repository...?
rysto32 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 03:44:05 UTC 2017
Yes, that's expected. Due to details in how git represents directory
trees, it is unable to represent empty directories.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:39 PM, David Wolfskill <david at catwhisker.org>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:35:41PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > For my first try, I created a shiny new local clone of the repo we
> > actually use internally,...
> > While I rather expected the first "difference" identified:
> > Only in ../svn/src: .svn
> > I was quote surprised to find 64 more "Only in ../svn/src/...." lines.
> > (I have attached a copy of the file.)
> > Is this expected?
> > ....
> Further investigation reveals that each of the cited file system objects
> (other than .svn) either is an empty directory or only contains empty
> Does that information have an effect on whether or not the result is
> David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org
> How could one possibly "respect" a misogynist, racist, bullying con-man??!?
> See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
More information about the freebsd-git