geom_fox vs geom_multipath?

Ivan Voras ivoras at freebsd.org
Mon Sep 26 13:29:26 UTC 2011


On 22/09/2011 12:51, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:48:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Hello, Freebsd-geom.
>>
>>   We have both geom_fox without control utility and strange way of
>> labelling and "conventional" geom_multipath.
>>
>>   They seems to perform same task, but geom_multipath looks like
>> "normal" module and geom_fox is very old one, before "rules" for
>> modules was settled (metadata in first sector, no control utility,
>> etc).
>>
>>   Is it intentional? :)
> 
> The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class.

Should it be disconnected from the build? I don't think it's ever used
in practice...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/attachments/20110926/6a1e048e/signature.pgp


More information about the freebsd-geom mailing list