RFC: adding 'proxy' nodes to provider ports (with patch)

[Ivan Voras]

2009/3/21 Marius Nünnerich <marius at nuenneri.ch>:

> Take a look at geom_nop, it doesn't taste. It is like a proxy already
> as far as I can see. I don't know what to do about the naming though.

Maybe I expressed it wrongly  - what I meant to say is that existing
"normal" GEOM classes, even if they are proxy-like in nature (like
GELI) cannot simply "be used" as a proxy in this context.