gvinum behaviour on disk failure

[R. B. Riddick]

--- Alastair Watts <awatts at pett.com.au> wrote:
> Am I missing something (perhaps data didn't get written to ad0, but then 
> shouldn't it have been in memory), or shouldn't gvinum have absorbed 
> this error and supplied the data from ad0?
> 
> Or is this a known issue/bug? I searched but couldn't find a similar 
> reference on this list..
> 
Hi Alastair!
Hi list!

I say, did u consider migrating to gmirror or graid3?
Or even graid5? ;-))
http://home.tiscali.de/cmdr_faako/geom_raid5.tbz
(now it has all new and compile-able files, that compile correctly... Thanks to
veronica (...) fluffles (...) net)

As far as I know, gvinum is not so good supported and has a lot of
dysfunctions/malfunctions and is just contained for people who want to stay
with vinum... vinum isnt so good supported since R5.X... But I am sure that
vinum was somewhen in R3/R4 a very good software-RAID-tool... I will never
forget it...

Bye
Arne

---
Arne likes "Kentucky fried movie" (here esp.: "United Appeal For the Dead")

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com