zfs scrub enable by default

[John Long]

On 03/08/2020 20:25, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2020-08-03 12:10, Steve Wills wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why we don't enable zfs periodic scrub by default?
>>
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/periodic/periodic.conf?view=markup#l162
>>
>>
>> Anyone happen to know?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
> I think switching this to on-by-default is a good thing.
> 
> To be clear, which the check is part of 'periodic daily', it only
> triggers a scrub if it has been more than 35 days since the last scrub.
> 
> FreeNAS already has does this, and that accounts for a large number of
> FreeBSD ZFS deployments.

There is a difference. FreeNAS is an appliance. It should minimize the 
need for management.

FreeBSD is the base OS. It should do as little as possible so people can 
set it up the way we want rather than spend days or weeks unbreaking 
surprising, non-standard behavior and hundreds of tweaks for everybody 
who requested them.

> There is tuning you can do in ZFS to try to lessen the impact of a scrub
> on your production workloads.

That's up to the guy running the box to do or not to do.

> The periodic script lets you select which pools to include (defaults to
> all), so you can tune it to only scrub your root pool every 35 days, and
> not the large pool that might take too long to scrub or whatever. It
> also lets you set a different threshold for each pool.

A NAS appliance could benefit from something like this. A generic OS cannot.

> So I don't see any reason not to enable it by default, and just document
> how to adjust it if people really need to disable it. Honestly, I think
> those who are disabling it are doing themselves a disservice.

It's offensive for you to presume to think you know better what the 
other guy needs than he does himself. Thank you for clarifying it 
though, I think it's valuable to understand the thinking of people who 
want to coopt the OS into their personal playground.

/jl