ZFS backup Q: send/recv and mountpoint property

[Borja Marcos]

> On 13 Aug 2018, at 11:47, Borja Marcos <borjam at sarenet.es> wrote:
> Otherwise, unless you have atime=off any read access will change the last access
> timestamps, which means that incremental snapshots won’t apply unless you force
> a rollback with a -N. Using -N is itself a bad idea because, in case of error, you might
> end up rolling back something you don’t want. If you avoid the rollback you will
> avoid making the recv destructive in any way.

I mean -F of course, not -N. Thanks to the attentive readers who poked me! :P





Borja.