HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP

[InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter]

Am 21.07.2016 um 10:24 schrieb InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter:
Nevermind, good to see having you much fun with this project. wish you
great secuess, but probably rethink some points and maybe consider the
keep it fuc... simpl thing. less parts, less moving parts, less black
magic which calls itself beeing smart / intelligent / proactive - theres
so much bs out there..

 Please,

 read this

 https://www.joyent.com/blog/network-storage-in-the-cloud-delicious-but-deadly

 where at the same point, like they descriped. guess what happened.

> Am 21.07.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Ben RUBSON:
>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 09:51, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter <jg at internetx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> i whould not expect to see something like maybe 2040 or so.
>>>
>>> no offense agains the zfs devs, imho the fs itself is not the right
>>> place for this. I could be wrong, if yes someone please feel free to
>>> point at it.
>>>
>>> In the End, to me it looks like you have taken the most important
>>> features out of hast, carp and probably rsf-1 cluster and with some
>>> mixing and stirring one can get a solution like this.
>>
>> HAST (same for Linux DRBD) adds an additional stack between the disks and ZFS.
>> In addition, HAST may require a lot of network bandwidth depending on the pool layout, much more than the incoming data throughput.
>> Built-in ZFS replication would require not much network bandwidth than the incoming data throughput itself.
>> Suitable for long-distance replication :)
>>
>>> no wont work, (somehow yes, but rather no: i dont know of anyone missing
>>> active sync replication, and manpower for this important parts is
>>> limited, but afaik theres the possility to sponsor such an addon.
>>>
>>> like, shut up and take my money
>>
>> We may then hope to see it before 2040 ;)
>>
>>> Am 21.07.2016 um 07:52 schrieb Ben RUBSON:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01 Jul 2016, at 17:02, Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think what we miss is some kind of this :
>>>>> http://milek.blogspot.fr/2007/03/zfs-online-replication.html
>>>>> http://www.compnect.net/?p=16461
>>>>>
>>>>> Online replication built in ZFS would be awesome.
>>>>
>>>> Note that I opened the following feature request a few days ago :
>>>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/7166
>>>>
>>>> Could be interesting to follow it.
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>