Cannot replace broken hard drive with LSI HBA
Graham Allan
allan at physics.umn.edu
Tue Sep 29 20:38:12 UTC 2015
On 9/29/2015 1:17 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>>
>> Regarding your experience with firmware 20, I believe it is "known bad",
>> though some seem to disagree. Certainly when building my recent-ish
>> large 9.3 servers I specifically tested it and got consistent data
>> corruption. There is now a newer release of firmware 20 , "20.00.04.00"
>> which seems to be fixed - see this thread:
>>
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2015-August/006793.html
>
> No, firmware 20.00.04.00 and driver 20.00.00.00-fbsd was the one that
> was used when ZFS freaked out, so it´s definitely not fixed.
>
> I think this calls for a bug report.
That is curious, since I could rapidly get data corruption with firmware
20.00.00.00, yet ran a stress test for about a week with 20.00.04.00
with no issues. That was with FreeBSD 9.3, but I just updated my test
system to 10.2, and it has been running the same stress test for 4-5
hours again with no issues. I don't doubt your experience at all, of
course, but I wonder what is different?
For what it's worth, my test machine is a Dell R610 with Dell TYVGC HBA
(unclear whether this is a 9207-8e or 9205-8e), and WD Red drives in a
Supermicro SC847 chassis.
Graham
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list