ZFS Deadlock?

[Nick Sivo]

We've got Racket running on 10.1 and are planning to switch over
tonight. I'll come back with new stack traces and logs if we encounter
similar problems.

Thanks!

-Nick

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Nick Sivo <nick at ycombinator.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately in our case we can't easily upgrade to 10 or 10.1
> because Racket (6.1.1) on them isn't stable and core dumps. Fixing
> Racket trunk on FreeBSD 10+ was not the next step I expected,
> especially since 9.3 is still considered "supported" for nearly two
> more years.
>
> Not what I wanted to hear, but good to know regardless. Thanks!
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated
>>>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4?  Will there be a 9.4?
>>>>>
>>>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to
>>>> 10 not 9 or 8.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more
>>> releases just patches...  but are we not getting a 9.4?  Should not the
>>> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated?
>>>
>> I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I wouldn't
>> expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm honest, the team
>> only has so much time so prioritising the latest releases is just something
>> that's going to have to happen.
>>
>> We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"