Could mount_msdosfs be less cryptic and more compatible with fsck_msdosfs?

[Lev Serebryakov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


 I could not mount FAT32 image, but "fsck_msdosfs" says, that it is
valid, good FAT32 image.

% sudo fsck_msdosfs /dev/md0
** /dev/md0
** Phase 1 - Read and Compare FATs
** Phase 2 - Check Cluster Chains
** Phase 3 - Checking Directories
** Phase 4 - Checking for Lost Files
7 files, 96256 free (188 clusters)
% sudo mount -t msdosfs /dev/md0 /mnt
mount_msdosfs: /dev/md0: Invalid argument
%

 I don't know what should I do to mount this image.

 I'm using 10-STABLE.

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov AKA Black Lion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=q+Q8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----