Solaris 10 zfs bug

[Jim Barker]

Steve,

That is good to hear, I just wanted to bring awareness to a potential issue.  I am happy that it doesn't seem to apply.

Regards,
Jim Barker

On June 3, 2014 7:33:28 PM EDT, Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>Its likely FreeBSD is quite different in that area, unless you
>can reproduce on a FreeBSD install its unlikely we're going to
>be able to do much about it.
>
>You might consider seeing if anyone on the openzfs lists knows
>of the issue though.
>
>    Regards
>    Steve
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Jim Barker" <jbarker at nixlike.com>
>To: "Mark Felder" <feld at freebsd.org>
>Cc: <freebsd-fs at freebsd.org>; <owner-freebsd-fs at freebsd.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:38 PM
>Subject: Re: Solaris 10 zfs bug
>
>
>Mark,
>
>I was looking at the timeframes that the core dumps occurred and around
>that time we were doing some zfs sends to replicate some 
>data on there. So either the snapshot creation, zfs send, or snapshot
>deletion may have triggered the bug.
>
>Jim
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Mark Felder <feld at freebsd.org>
>To: Jim Barker <jbarker at nixlike.com>
>Cc: freebsd-fs at freebsd.org; owner-freebsd-fs at freebsd.org
>Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 1:07 PM
>Subject: Re: Solaris 10 zfs bug
>
>
>On 2014-06-03 11:48, Jim Barker wrote:
>
>> FYI:
>>
>> I encountered a bug in Solaris 10 that may also be present in the
>code
>> that FreeBSD forked some time ago. This is the forum entry I put up
>> in case it's relevant.
>>
>>
>https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=46716&p=261143#p261143
>>
>>
>
>Do you have any details on how to reproduce the panic? That would
>permit
>the developers to find the bug in the FreeBSD port of ZFS and fix it.
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"