zfs: the exponential file system from hell
Borja Marcos
borjam at sarenet.es
Tue Oct 1 09:18:20 UTC 2013
On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:44 AM, kpneal at pobox.com wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Borja Marcos wrote:
>> Anyway, in a system with variable datasets "df" is actually meaningless and you should rely on "zpool list", which gives you
>> the real size, allocated space, free space, etc.
>>
>>
>> % zpool list
>> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
>> pool 1.59T 500G 1.11T 30% 1.00x ONLINE -
>> %
>
> See that the zfs command says aurd0 has used 2.14T of space while the zpool
> command says it has used 3.21T? But aursys (the mirror) has numbers that
> roughly match.
>
> Since 'zfs' works above the pool level it gives accurate sizes no matter
> what kind of redundancy (if any) you are using.
>
> Bottom line:
> The replacement for the 'df' command when using ZFS is 'zfs list'.
Ouch, I stand corrected!
Thank you :)
Borja.
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list