FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances
Davide D'Amico
davide.damico at contactlab.com
Mon Mar 18 19:32:35 UTC 2013
Il 18.03.2013 20:28 Steven Hartland ha scritto:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davide D'Amico"
> <davide.damico at contactlab.com>
>>> How does ZFS compare if you do it on 1 SSD as per your second
>>> UFS test? As I'm wondering the mfi cache is kicking in?
>> Well, it was a test :)
>> The MFI cache is enabled because I am using mfid* as jbod (mfiutil
>> create jbod mfid3 mfid4 mfid5 mfid6):
>
> Don't use mfiutil to do this it doesnt work it creates mirrors.
>
> Use MegaCli instead to create real jbods e.g.
> MegaCli -AdpSetProp -EnableJBOD -1 -aALL
>
Ok, I'll give it a try (never used, I thought it has been dismissed),
and I'll let you know.
>> And the result from sysbench:
>> General statistics:
>> total time: 82.9567s
>> total number of events: 1
>> total time taken by event execution: 82.9545s
>
> Thats hardly doing any disk access at all, so odd it would be doubling
> your benchmark time.
>
>> Using a SSD:
>> # iostat mfid2 -x 2
>> tty mfid2 cpu
>> tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id
>> 0 32 125.21 31 3.84 0 0 0 0 99
[...]
>> 0 585 0.00 0 0.00 3 0 1 0 96
>> 0 22 4.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 100
>> And the result from sysbench:
>> General statistics:
>> total time: 36.1146s
>> total number of events: 1
>> total time taken by event execution: 36.1123s
>> That are the same results using SAS disks.
>
> So this is ZFS on the SSD, resulting the same benchmark results as
> UFS?
This is UFS on SSD, that has the same behaviour than UFS on RAID10 HW
on SAS drives.
d.
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list