>> Would it be safe to have fsck automagically fix this problem, as the >> doc (incorrectly) says it does? > > What happens if you add to /etc/rc.conf: > > fsck_y_enable="YES" > background_fsck="NO" Fsck -y is not safe. :-( Would it be *safe* to have "fsck -p" automagically fix this problem, as the doc (incorrectly) says it does?