ZFS regimen: scrub, scrub, scrub and scrub again.

[Chris Rees]

On 23 Jan 2013 20:23, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
>>>
>>> While RAID-Z is already a king of bad performance,
>>
>>
>> I don't believe RAID-Z is any worse than RAID5.  Do you have any actual
>> measurements to back up your claim?
>
>
> it is clearly described even in ZFS papers. Both on reads and writes it
gives single drive random I/O performance.

So we have to take your word for it?

Provide a link if you're going to make assertions, or they're no more than
your own opinion.

Chris