RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:43:42PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any reason why we shouldn't throw this into contrib/ and
> treating it like a vendor thing?
> Or is this explicitly not being treated as a vendor FS?
No idea. This should be a decision of the person who imports the filesystem.

> 
> Other than that, sure, let's get it into the tree and then thrash it
> until it's stable..
No, please fix at least the dreadful bugs before committing.
We have enough dead and buggy filesystems in the tree already.
The problem with fusefs code is the lack of maintainer, and not the
location of the code.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20120308/a56b4119/attachment.pgp