zfs/zpool upgrade required?
krad
kraduk at gmail.com
Wed May 4 15:21:38 UTC 2011
On 4 May 2011 12:55, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd at jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Robert Schulze wrote:
> > when upgrading from 8.0 to 8-STABLE, kernel and userland support new
> > versions of ZFS pool and filesystem.
> >
> > Is it _required_ to upgrade existing pools and filesystems or can
> > that be done anytime later?
>
> - It can be done later, though by not upgrading you lose the ability to
> use newer features. For a list of what those are, refer to the
> official OpenSolaris docs. See menu on left side, near bottom:
>
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zfs/whatis
>
> - Make sure to note that the pool version and the filesystem version are
> separate. Some folks remember to "zpool upgrade" but not "zfs upgrade".
>
> - Remember that upgrading is one-way; you cannot roll back to an older
> version without destroying your pools. If you're worried, do full
> backups beforehand.
>
> --
> | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
> | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
> | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
> | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
Generally in production i would leave it on the old pool version for a
while, until you are confident you are not having any issues. As previously
stated you can then roll back more easily. When you are happy upgrade the
pool.
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list