RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one
Jeremy Chadwick
freebsd at jdc.parodius.com
Thu Apr 21 00:34:37 UTC 2011
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:14:22PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > - Has the experimental code been stress-tested? If so, how? I've heard
> > of people doing silly things like testing with filesystem benchmark
> > utilities -- which pass/work fine, but the instant someone tries
> > using something like rsnapshot (like we do), the thing falls apart.
> >
> Just fyi, Peter Holms (pho@) has volunteered to do some stress testing,
> which is now in progress.
>
> Thanks go to him for doing this, rick
Totally awesome. Thank you both for doing this -- I can probably
safely speak for the community when I say we all appreciate it. :-)
Also, related yet unrelated: our production environment is running the
experimental server as of ~48 hours ago, and things seem okay. Our
rsync jobs have all passed w/out issue, no anomalies.
The stablerestart(5) stuff needs to get dealt with before the switch-to
experimental-server-as-default gets flipped on, but I know you'll get to
that, Rick. If you need any testing/help from me, just let me know.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list