background fsck considered harmful? (Re: panic:
handle_written_inodeblock: bad size)
Mikhail T.
mi+thun at aldan.algebra.com
Tue Jul 20 16:49:01 UTC 2010
20.07.2010 11:44, Kirk McKusick написав(ла):
> Adding it to all the panic's will be a lot of work,
> but I agree would be useful. I will look into doing so when I
> get a chance.
>
> Kirk McKusick
>
How about disabling background fsck in a default install? It seems to be
the consensus here, that my troubles were due to fsck not fixing the
file-system properly reboot after reboot...
Yours,
-mi
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list