More stable and reliable NTFS driver for read-only access?
Jeremy Chadwick
freebsd at jdc.parodius.com
Mon Jul 5 13:37:20 UTC 2010
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:24:19PM +0000, Mikle Krutov wrote:
> Which ntfs driver is more reliable, stable
> and fast for read-only access, ntfs-3g or
> kernel one?
> Never ever had a contact with ntfs on
> fbsd, and friend of mine asks to backup
> his data to my machine (from ntfs hdd,
> formated in vista, if it makes any
> difference)
I remember there being a thread last year sometime about the possibility
of NTFS support removed from the kernel due to its age, but I forget
what the outcome was.
You're probably better off using something from ports, possibly with
fuse.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list