ZFS RaidZ2 with 24 drives?
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us
Fri Jan 1 16:56:47 UTC 2010
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Danny Carroll wrote:
>
> You do not have this protection when ZFS has access to the raw devices.
> Even worse if the devices write cache is turned on.
This statement does not appear to be true. ZFS will always request
that devices flush their cache. The only time there is no
"protection" is if the device ignores that flush request and the cache
is volatile. Controller battery-backed RAM is useful since the
controller can respond to the cache flush request once the data is in
battery-backed RAM, thereby dramatically improving write latencies for
small writes
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list