Various FreeBSD Coda fixes
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 21 17:04:32 PST 2008
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
> I'm not sure if these can be MFC'd before 7.0, but will ask re@ if we can
> fit them in. Certainly, it's better than panicking, which is a relatively
> likely scenario with what's currently in RELENG_7.
I've merged these, and a couple more since then, to RLEENG_7, and will request
an MFC to RELENG_7_0 to include them in the forthcoming FreeBSD 7.0. It would
be very helpful, if you have a 7.x box, if you could update to the head of
RELENG_7 to pick up these fixes, and test with Coda with them.
I'm aware of four outstanding problems:
- Rune has reported a hang with X11 and Coda, but we haven't yet been able to
track it down much yet -- might not be related to Coda.
- Linux binaries have problems listing directories in Coda under Linux
emulation. Won't be fixed for 7.0.
- ".." and "." sometimes appear to have problems in the root directory of the
root volume of a realm (i.e., /coda/testserver.coda.cs.cmu.edu). I'm not
sure if this is a Coda client bug or a kernel bug, quite possibly the
latter. This most likely won't be fixed for 7.0 unless it jumps out at me
tomorrow.
- getpwd() appears to have problems, possibly related to the previous bug if
it's unable to recurse to the root. Because Coda doesn't use the global
VFS namecache, the __getcwd() system call which is often able to resolve the
current directly doesn't work with Coda; the userspace implementation walks
to the root looking for the child directory in each parent, which can have
problems if stat() and inode numbers are inconsistent, or if there's a
broken ".." step. Ditto on this most likely not being fixed for 7.0.
Any other problems, especially panics with the backport of the other fixes to
RELENG_7, are very much fair game, but having the reports by the end of
Tuesday would be extremely helpful.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list