[RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
Csaba Henk
csaba-ml at creo.hu
Wed Feb 13 17:01:21 UTC 2008
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:11:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Csaba Henk <csaba-ml at creo.hu> writes:
> > So I think: fuse4bsd (ie, the kld + the mount util) + libfolly + sysctl
> > fs could go to base under BSD license. It also might make sense to rebase
> > ntfs-3g atop of folly -- although it won't help ntfs-3g being GPL'd.
>
> That doesn't matter; ntfs-3g can still be a port.
>
> What does matter is that if libfolly exports the same API as libfuse, we
> can have a complete BSD-licensed FUSE implementation in the base system,
> with minimal effort required to port FUSE-based file systems.
No, it's a different API. I don't see it would have much importance to
clone the libfuse API, because:
- If FreeBSD wants a filesystem for its own internal purposes (like a
filesytem interface to sysctls) it can use folly.
- The huge majority of FUSE based filesystems in common use are GPL
licensed anyway, and given this, I don't see the gain of having
them backed with a BSD licensed library instead of a LGPL'd one.
And they are as fine in ports as ntfs-3g is.
Csaba
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list