Writing contigiously to UFS2?
anderson at freebsd.org
Fri Sep 21 09:30:59 PDT 2007
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Eric Anderson wrote:
>> I recommend trying msdos fs. On recent -CURRENT, it should perform
>> fairly well (akin to UFS2 I think), and if I recall correctly, has a
>> more contiguous block layout.
> It can give perfect contiguity for data blocks, but has serious slowness
> non-sequential access to large files, and anyway "large" for msdosfs is
> only 4GB.
Oops - forgot about the 4GB limit. I was also assuming that the random
read in a big file problem wasn't an issue due to the configuration
noted by the original poster.. but maybe that's a bad assumption.
More information about the freebsd-fs