heavy NFS writes lead to corrup summary in superblock

[Eric Anderson]

Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:27, Eric Anderson написав:
>> Just curious - what NFS mount options are being used, 
> 
> The fs is accessed by the remote client machines (mostly -- Solaris) via 
> automounters -- with the default parameters.
> 
>> and are you changing any sysctl's (vfs/nfs related)?
> 
> No, should I?
> 
> 	-mi


Shouldn't need to - I just recalled having seen some strange problems 
long ago when 'tweaking' some vfs sysctls, and wondering if you had 
possibly done the same.

I'm curious to know if just local heavy writes would cause the problem, 
or if it has to be through NFS.  Also, possibly adding the 'sync' option 
to the fs mount point could change things..

I'm not sure what those things would tell us for sure, but they would be 
interesting none-the-less.


Eric


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------