п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:20, Scott Long написав: > The space savings you get from UFS1 is that the inodes are half the size > and the indorect blocks can hold more block pointers. I don't believe > that ACLs play a difference here. Aren't the ACLs recorded in the inodes -- which would explain, why those are twice larger in UFS2? Thanks! -mi