A bad lost+found causes fsck of FFS to repeatefly fail.
Julian Stacey
jhs at berklix.org
Wed Mar 2 23:21:52 GMT 2005
I wrote about 24 hours ago:
> I had a FFS error that fsck couldnt fix, & I've seen similar before:
> If content of lost+found/ is itself damaged, fsck fails, it seems.
> Then one has to manually [copy elsewhere] & rm -rf lost+found then re-fsck.
> Should the above be added to man fsck, or
> content below submitted as a send-pr ? Or do readers here
> include FFS / FSCK maintainers ?
>
> Log & environ follow:
>
> uname -a
> FreeBSD fire.jhs.private 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Sat
> Feb 26 21:47:28 CET 2005
> jhs at fire.jhs.private:/usr1/src/sys/amd64/compile/FIRE64.small amd64
Same scenario a day later on another of my hosts !
This one is not a 64bit amd just a normal 686,
FreeBSD film.jhs.private 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
#0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004
root at harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
& its a 33 Gig instead of 40 Gig partition. Other than that, same story.
-
Julian Stacey Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list