A bad lost+found causes fsck of FFS to repeatefly fail.

Julian Stacey jhs at berklix.org
Wed Mar 2 23:21:52 GMT 2005


I wrote about 24 hours ago:

> I had a FFS error that fsck couldnt fix, & I've seen similar before:
>   If content of lost+found/ is itself damaged, fsck fails, it seems.
>   Then one has to manually [copy elsewhere] & rm -rf lost+found then re-fsck.
> Should the above be added to man fsck, or
> content below submitted as a send-pr ? Or do readers here
> include FFS / FSCK maintainers ?
> 
> Log & environ follow:
> 
> uname -a
>   FreeBSD fire.jhs.private 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Sat
>   Feb 26 21:47:28 CET 2005
>   jhs at fire.jhs.private:/usr1/src/sys/amd64/compile/FIRE64.small amd64

Same scenario a day later on another of my hosts !
This one is not a 64bit amd just a normal 686, 
	FreeBSD film.jhs.private 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
	#0: Fri Nov  5 04:19:18 UTC 2004
	root at harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
& its a 33 Gig instead of 40 Gig partition. Other than that, same story.

-
Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich       http://berklix.com
Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list