LFS vs FFS

[Pedro F. Giffuni]

Hi;

The NetBSD guys compared FFS and LFS here:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2003/03/30/0001.html

"LFS beats FFS+softdep hands down, which is not
surprising."

I think FFS should do colocation but since there is so
little (no) interest, perhaps it's a good time to port
LFS:

"A preliminary conclusion is that LFS is now pretty
stable for normal usage (although I didn't create any
disk-nearly-full situations which make LFS' life
hard), and then it does quite well. The write
case is worth some investigation."

Do your own comparisons though ;).

    Pedro.



______________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html