PR mail (was: Re: NFS ftruncate patch for review)

Bruce Evans bde at zeta.org.au
Fri Jul 18 23:25:05 PDT 2003


On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tim Robbins wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:38:12PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > BTW, what stopped PRs being mailed to the "normal" lists?  freebsd-bugs is
> > normal I think.
>
> The PRs are still getting mailed to freebsd-bugs. The reason you didn't see my
> patch when I replied to the PR is because Kris assigned the PR to me. The

I still feel I'm missing many of them.  I'll do a more scientific survey.

> reason followups go to the freebsd-bugs list is because, by default, the
> Responsible: field in the PR is set to freebsd-bugs. It would be better if
> Gnats would always Cc the bugs list.

I've got the feeling that the default is sometimes (and more often than it
used to be) freebsd-list-that-I'm-not-on.  Ports PRs always went to somewhere
that I didn't see.  I rather liked this.

Gnats does too good a job of sending all the administrivial mail to
freebsd-bugs, as shown by Kris recently generating more PR mail than all
commits :-).

Bruce


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list