[Bug 230002] math/suitesparse build failure on FreeBSD 11 i386 and amd64

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230002

--- Comment #11 from dewayne at heuristicsystems.com.au ---
(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #2)
On FreeBSD amd64 11.3Stable

 make __MAKE_CONF=/etc/make_test.conf -C /usr/ports/math/suitesparse clean
package
...
a - cholmod_l_camd.o
cc  -L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc9  -L/usr/local/lib/gcc9 -B/usr/local/bin
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector 
-L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib -shared
-Wl,-soname -Wl,libcholmod.so.3 -Wl,--no-undefined -fopenmp cholmod_aat.o
cholmod_add.o cholmod_band.o cholmod_change_factor.o cholmod_common.o
cholmod_complex.o cholmod_copy.o cholmod_dense.o cholmod_error.o
cholmod_factor.o cholmod_memory.o cholmod_sparse.o cholmod_transpose.o
cholmod_triplet.o cholmod_version.o cholmod_check.o cholmod_read.o
cholmod_write.o cholmod_amd.o cholmod_analyze.o cholmod_colamd.o
cholmod_etree.o cholmod_factorize.o cholmod_postorder.o cholmod_rcond.o
cholmod_resymbol.o cholmod_rowcolcounts.o cholmod_rowfac.o cholmod_solve.o
cholmod_spsolve.o cholmod_drop.o cholmod_horzcat.o cholmod_norm.o
cholmod_scale.o cholmod_sdmult.o cholmod_ssmult.o cholmod_submatrix.o
cholmod_vertcat.o cholmod_symmetry.o cholmod_rowadd.o cholmod_rowdel.o
cholmod_updown.o cholmod_super_numeric.o cholmod_super_solve.o
cholmod_super_symbolic.o cholmod_ccolamd.o cholmod_csymamd.o cholmod_metis.o
cholmod_nesdis.o cholmod_camd.o cholmod_l_aat.o cholmod_l_add.o
cholmod_l_band.o cholmod_l_change_factor.o cholmod_l_common.o
cholmod_l_complex.o cholmod_l_copy.o cholmod_l_dense.o cholmod_l_error.o
cholmod_l_factor.o cholmod_l_memory.o cholmod_l_sparse.o cholmod_l_transpose.o
cholmod_l_triplet.o cholmod_l_version.o cholmod_l_check.o cholmod_l_read.o
cholmod_l_write.o cholmod_l_amd.o cholmod_l_analyze.o cholmod_l_colamd.o
cholmod_l_etree.o cholmod_l_factorize.o cholmod_l_postorder.o cholmod_l_rcond.o
cholmod_l_resymbol.o cholmod_l_rowcolcounts.o cholmod_l_rowfac.o
cholmod_l_solve.o cholmod_l_spsolve.o cholmod_l_drop.o cholmod_l_horzcat.o
cholmod_l_norm.o cholmod_l_scale.o cholmod_l_sdmult.o cholmod_l_ssmult.o
cholmod_l_submatrix.o cholmod_l_vertcat.o cholmod_l_symmetry.o
cholmod_l_rowadd.o cholmod_l_rowdel.o cholmod_l_updown.o
cholmod_l_super_numeric.o cholmod_l_super_solve.o cholmod_l_super_symbolic.o
cholmod_l_ccolamd.o cholmod_l_csymamd.o cholmod_l_metis.o cholmod_l_nesdis.o
cholmod_l_camd.o -o
/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib/libcholmod.so.3.0.12
-lm -lamd -lcolamd -lsuitesparseconfig -lccolamd -lcamd -L/usr/local/lib
-lmetis  -L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc9  -L/usr/local/lib/gcc9 -B/usr/local/bin
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector  -llapack
-L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc9  -L/usr/local/lib/gcc9 -B/usr/local/bin
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector  -lopenblasp
/usr/local/bin/ranlib libcholmod.a
/usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -llapack
cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
gmake[4]: *** [Makefile:544:
/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib/libcholmod.so.3.0.12]
Error 1

CFLAGS and LDFLAGS used 
make __MAKE_CONF=/etc/make_test.conf -C /usr/ports/math/suitesparse -VCFLAGS
-Vspace -VLDFLAGS
-O2 -pipe  -I/usr/local/include -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing

 -L/var/ports/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc9  -L/usr/local/lib/gcc9 -B/usr/local/bin
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector

Building math/lapack before and after the failure is successful (===>  Building
package for lapack-3.5.0_8)

This using gcc9.0.1 and latest binutils 2.32.

Unfortunately I no longer have the requirement for this suite, so this is to
help those that experience a similar problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.