[Bug 228007] math/lapack: switch to flang
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun May 6 22:33:08 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228007
sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sgk at troutmask.apl.washingto
| |n.edu
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu ---
(In reply to robert.ayrapetyan from comment #3)
> hm, thanks, I've missed that somehow... I've just commited a patch
> for it (see >https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222254#c12).
> gfortran's FreeBSD issue is really annoying and affects virtually all
> scientific packages (e.g. Python's Keras, or recently added math/mlpack).
> With FreeBSD's movement from gcc to clang, flang is the only right choice
> in a long-term perspective. To avoid even more issues and incompatibilities
> in the future I'm encouraging FreeBSD's ports maintainers to make this
> switch ASAP.
As a long time user of FreeBSD (since it was called 386BSD+patchkit)
and a long time contributor to both FreeBSD and gfortran, can you
elaborate on gfortran's FreeBSD issue.
Switching to Flang without actually testing its performance, conformance
to standards, and quality is somewhat a questionable move. Last time
I tried compiling gfortran's testsuite with Flang, it found somewhere
around 100 internal compiler errors.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-fortran
mailing list