/compat/linux and /usr/compat/linux
Gary Jennejohn
gljennjohn at gmail.com
Sun Feb 8 10:10:27 UTC 2015
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
Patrick Powell <papowell at astart.com> wrote:
> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
> /usr/compat
>
> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to
> /usr/compat.
>
> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take
> place (just out of curiosity)?
>
> Question: can linproc be in /compat/linux/proc or /usr/compat/linux/proc?
> Question: if you have a /usr/compat/linux/lib directory will this be
> added to the
> libraries for linux emulation?
>
/compat has historically always been a symbolic link to /usr/compat:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Nov 25 2011 /compat -> usr/compat
linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local)
but in my /etc/fstab I have
linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
Since /compat is a symbolic link it resolves to /usr/compat when it's
used.
--
Gary Jennejohn
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list