VirtualBox - no screen refresh

[Boris]

Is it the > 100% which looks weird to you? if you have got a multicore
system, you got x times 100% where x = number of core if I am not wrong...



On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos <matheus at eternamente.info>wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:52:58 -0300 (BRT)
> "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus at eternamente.info> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, July 23, 2009 03:14, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> > > On Thu, July 23, 2009 2:02 am, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, July 22, 2009 20:15, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, July 21, 2009 05:58, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> > >>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 10:33 pm, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, July 20, 2009 14:47, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
> > >>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I got Revision 427 compiled on amd64 unfortunately it crashes at
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> time of
> > >>>>>>> launching any VM. I have provided some details to Beat and
> pointed
> > >>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>> thread as the issue looked similar to Vladimir's one when reading
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> core.txt file produced after the system crash.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It does not crash any more with very recent kernel.
> > >>>>>> So, probably you may do another try.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have here:
> > >>>>> $ uname -a
> > >>>>> FreeBSD xxx 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 17 15:30:47
> BRT
> > >>>>> 2009
> > >>>>>     root at xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx  amd64
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> and got to boot debian 5 amd64 cd and right now I'm quite at the
> end
> > >>>>> of
> > >>>>> the install. this is just possible using just one cpu. when tried
> > >>>>> using
> > >>>>> two cpu's, somewhere before disk selection it dies.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Did the install finish successfully or did the vm crash? Because
> with
> > >>>> 7.2-RELEASE/amd64 i have spotted a problem which crashes the VM
> after
> > >>>> a
> > >>>> few minutes with I/O activity. I couldn't fully install Arch Linux
> nor
> > >>>> Windows7 yet.
> > >>>
> > >>> I got it running here. tested the last svn rev today. i got so much
> > >>> happy
> > >>> I installed debian and got both cpu to full load. a while after I
> > >>> looked
> > >>> and my box was frozen :(
> > >>>
> > >>> so now on small steps. I have now two cpu and VT-x enabled. it looks
> > >>> good
> > >>> so far. but I know when I fire folding at home, using both cpu is no
> > >>> good
> > >>> anymore.
> > >>> I'll let it this way for a while to see if it freezes, and then will
> > >>> try
> > >>> one cpu and full load.
> > >>>
> > >>> this is work, so I'll try to reproduce this at home, using 8-beta and
> > >>> post
> > >>> here.
> > >>>
> > >>> thanks,
> > >>
> > >> slight change of plans. I did run the single core test first. 40
> minutes
> > >> full load and ok.
> > >>
> > >> I'll run both cores and a single core full load to see.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Sounds good so far. Could you please also try to copy something in the
> VM
> > > around? Would be interesting if that causes the crash.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > hail,
> >
> > since that day, this box is running Folding at Home in its single core
> > client (the one that freebsd has also) and is ok. I have a two core vm,
> > running amd64 Debian and jut one cpu is full load.
> >
> > I tried to reproduce this at home, but no luck though. Same Core 2 Duo
> > E6750, but this time 8-BETA2 and Zotac nVidia based motherboard. This
> will
> > only work in 7.2 amd64 ?
> >
> > by moving things around, dd if=/dev/zero of=any_file suffice ? I got it
> > writing about 380MB. My virtual disk is small, so I can go as high as
> > 600MB.
> >
> > so here, just the folding smp client makes my pc crash.
> > single_core+vm+vt+amd64 is fine.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > matheus
>
> a bit more on info. running two single cores fah also makes no freeze.
> just appears wierd in top:
> 1983 matheus      15  44    0   632M   544M ucond   0   0:00 135.25%
> VirtualBox
>
> but thats ok :)
>
> performance is good, not sure when two running, but one was s fast as real
> machine.
>
> next step for me is see performance in smp mode and make it not freeze pc
> :)
>
> thanks,
>
> matheus
>
> --
> We will call you cygnus,
> The God of balance you shall be
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-emulation at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>