HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed

Kostik Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 14:03:13 PDT 2009


On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:08:23PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:27:42AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> 
> *snip*
> 
> >>*at() can not be MFCed as it would change the native VFS ABI (Roman 
> >>implemented the FreeBSD side of *at() calls to be able to emulate the 
> >>linux *at() calls).
> >
> >It can be MFCed with low-impact KBI breakage, and I have re@ approval 
> >for the MFC. What actually stopped the merge is an issue with missed 
> >audit bits for dirfd descriptors. They are missed in HEAD too, so 8.0 
> >needs some action to finish this.
> 
> Sweet!  :)
> 
> BTW, is that re@ approval for committing to RELENG_7 before or after 
> 7.2?
Shortly after 7.1, if this matters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/attachments/20090403/9b0f4477/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-emulation mailing list