HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed
Kostik Belousov
kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 14:03:13 PDT 2009
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:08:23PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:27:42AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
> >>*at() can not be MFCed as it would change the native VFS ABI (Roman
> >>implemented the FreeBSD side of *at() calls to be able to emulate the
> >>linux *at() calls).
> >
> >It can be MFCed with low-impact KBI breakage, and I have re@ approval
> >for the MFC. What actually stopped the merge is an issue with missed
> >audit bits for dirfd descriptors. They are missed in HEAD too, so 8.0
> >needs some action to finish this.
>
> Sweet! :)
>
> BTW, is that re@ approval for committing to RELENG_7 before or after
> 7.2?
Shortly after 7.1, if this matters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/attachments/20090403/9b0f4477/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list