flash9 checklist (was: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD)

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Friday 31 October 2008 10:08:22 Roman Divacky wrote:
>>> we can expect problems in future
>>> when people dont mount linprocfs..
>>>
>>> maybe we should put some checks into linuxulator... 
>> 
>> Or if we put something in browser startup scripts it also needs to
>> be in the native ones since those can use linux flash via wrappers
>> as well.
> 
> the native ff + linuxflash uses linuxulator (ie. /compat/linux/proc) ?
> I dont think so...

Yes, it does. The wrapper plugin loaded by the browser is native, but
the actual plugin runs in a separate linuxulator process and needs
linprocfs.