ports/119880: emulators/linux_base-f7 - [linux] OpenOffice 2.x
fails after portupgrade with "error writing file"
Gaspar Chilingarov
nm at web.am
Tue Jan 22 03:42:03 PST 2008
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> The port itself doesn't install LINUXBASE/tmp (it is removed before
> install). Take a look at the Makefile:
> -----
> ...
> REMOVE_DIRS= boot dev home initrd root tmp var/log var/run var/tmp
> ...
> -----
>
> Seems that you have a stale directory. Please check it up.
>
> WBR
I got the source of the problem.
If you run OpenOffice using root account, it creates /compat/linux/tmp
with illegal permissions.
Shouldn't linuxolator report to linux applications that /tmp exists,
even if we have no /compat/linux/tmp, but have /tmp ? This is a trace of
opeoffice calls
42087 soffice.bin CALL close(0xc)
42087 soffice.bin RET close 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_mkdir(0xffffc5fc,0x1ff)
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux"
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux/tmp"
42087 soffice.bin RET linux_mkdir 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL umask(0x3f)
42087 soffice.bin RET umask 18/0x12
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_open(0xffffc4e4,0x18800,0xffffc4e8)
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux/tmp"
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux"
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux/tmp"
42087 soffice.bin RET linux_open 12/0xc
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_fstat64(0xc,0xffffc468,0x2935fff4)
42087 soffice.bin RET linux_fstat64 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_fcntl64(0xc,0x2,0x1)
42087 soffice.bin RET linux_fcntl64 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL umask(0x12)
42087 soffice.bin RET umask 63/0x3f
42087 soffice.bin CALL close(0xc)
42087 soffice.bin RET close 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL gettimeofday(0xffffd4ec,0)
42087 soffice.bin RET gettimeofday 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_mkdir(0xffffc4ec,0x1ff)
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux/tmp"
42087 soffice.bin NAMI "/compat/linux/tmp/sv248.tmp"
42087 soffice.bin RET linux_mkdir 0
42087 soffice.bin CALL linux_mkdir(0xffffbd30,0x1ff)
As you can see, mkdir does not check, that fallback directory exists,
but creates one under /compat/linux .... is it right?
I'm off the -emulation list, so please cc me.
Kernel info:
FreeBSD aldan.web.am 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Jan 10
22:39:43 AMT 2008
root at aldan.web.am:/mnt/ufsflash/src/obj/usr/src1/sys/nm amd64
compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.20
/Gaspar
--
Gaspar Chilingarov
System Administrator,
Network security consulting
t +37493 419763 (mob)
i 63174784
e nm at web.am
w http://gasparchilingarov.com/
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list