Does somebody work on NanoBSD?

[Warner Losh]

On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> Hello, Olivier.
> You wrote 11 апреля 2011 г., 11:51:09:
> 
>>>  Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one
>>> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is completely
>>> broken and almost useless.
>> I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem.
>> What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ?
>  (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and
> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition
> 
>  (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/'
> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to
> "ufs/labels1") sed complains.

That hardly qualifies as completely broken.

Those are bugs, and I'll look at fixing them.

Warner