Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

[jgh at FreeBSD.org]

On 2019-09-18 09:07, Pau Amma wrote:
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-gnome.html
> (in 6.10.1. Introduction) contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to
> /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in
> section 3,
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html.
> In addition, maybe that mention should be repeated in section 4,
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/slow-porting.html.
> 
> Opinions? (Note: "go file a bug" is a perfectly valid opinion.)

Thanks for the report! I've just committed a fix for this.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision&revision=53449

-jgh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20191002/93dee6fc/attachment.sig>