RFC: Dealing with version-specific docs

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Mon Jan 28 13:14:50 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor at freebsd.org> wrote:

> Em 28-01-2013 13:15, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk escreveu:
>
>> I think , the required effort for version specific Handbook is much less
>> than multiple version covering Handbook , because , if any change is not
>> applied to a prior version , which is mostly the case ,
>> its Handbook will also not be modified .
>> If a change is applied to a version and it is copied also to prior
>> versions , the changes to the Handbook may also be copied to their
>> Handbooks . This will not be difficult than to modify a multiple version
>> contained Handbook .
>>
>> As a result , again my primary suggestion is to make the Handbook version
>> specific : When a version is branched , its Handbook and related other
>> documentation also should be branched and maintained with the related
>> version .
>>
> Mehmet, thanks for the comments but I was interested in comments of that
> very specific technical solution that I proposed on the linked wiki page.
> The necessity of handling version-specific information has been discussed
> several times both on the lists and on conferences so please let's focus on
> technical solutions rather than going back to general discussions. If you
> see the linked page, there was no branching mentioned there, it is a much
> easier and simpler approach.
>
> Gabor
>


I am very sorry about not being on subject .

Thank you very much .

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk


More information about the freebsd-doc mailing list