Do we really need articles/cvs-freebsd anymore?

[Xin Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2/7/13 9:53 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Now that everything (src, ports, doc) has moved off CVS, does it
> make sense to keep articles/cvs-freebsd around anymore?  I think
> it's probably better to point people away from ncvs/dcvs-style
> setups.
> 
> It may also be worth replacing the cvs-freebsd article with
> something that talks about subversion, or even some of the git
> repositories mentioned in https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow -
> but this can be done separately.
> 
> So what do you think, is it ok to 'svn rm' the cvs-freebsd/ article
> and then look into replacing it with something more modern?

CVS is still being used in internal repositories including re@ and
secteam@, it's easy to set up and works fine for small groups.

I think writing new articles should take higher priority than removing
old ones, especially when there is no new article that acts similar
role of the old ones...

Just my $0.02

Cheers,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRFJWZAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzXXcH/1OjHM7lwiBuMlGtel9PCcNf
zSxX5V4rKWa5VRmNSkpyl9S/ZzRMRGq+bdsU6roexklg9Y91adVSmGD2gLg+0MCy
JcWP8JOBIL/+XPOF3c8lyp1HfqusO9eoJF4HhwIKo2f32S4dcHSDf69NhMoPvVIY
xSPRQgMkH0tCySlP2cGpQ2P4/4mPe5RyIHFilfagTCaaWHywhWQl8fV64KLkHDiL
8IaR2Dwt0dCAQMOkqXa6YXGv5J4qHOgZOkgWBLOb11X4adDgtRSfCWJAfy+xXRpp
rqwGTdZAmGypT8kxfseJniT9B3Rnq/8DT5O/B5p7RcbmLGbsFDWdsC49gpZDmD4=
=Yua0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----