why we don't build ps/pdf of /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ ?

[Simon L. B. Nielsen]

On 10 Aug 2012, at 00:02, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:

> We build /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ into ascii
> documents. Is there a reason why we don't
> also build Postscript or PDF?

I suspect since it was considered waste of space originally when it was set up.

If anyone were to touch those docs I would suggest moving them to the doc repository instead of changing them where they currently exist as they don't really belong in src.

-- 
Simon L. B. Nielsen