Conversion to SVN

[Doug Barton]

On 10/09/2011 09:41, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:37:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/09/2011 08:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>>>> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>>>>> And before doing the change, some things should
>>>>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/
>>>> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release 
>>>> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. 
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim
>>> from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need
>>> of a doc tree.
>>
>> If there isn't already a knob to avoid building the docs in the new
>> release building system (like there was in the old one) then there
>> certainly should be.
>>
> 
> By "release" I meant "release bits + its release docs".

Yes, I understood what you meant. What I'm saying is that what you see
as a bug, I see as a feature.

>> Meanwhile, one of the virtues of having doc and src in the same svn repo
>> is the ability to have one canonical version of the documentation.
>>
> 
> 



-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/