docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in Handbook
sonic2000gr at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 18:26:23 UTC 2011
On 7/12/2011 7:20 μμ, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR docs/163102; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: Patrick Lamaiziere<patfbsd at davenulle.org>
> To: bug-followup at freebsd.org<bug-followup at freebsd.org>
> Cc: Kevin Baxter<voidchicken at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in Handbook
> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:02:34 +0100
> Le Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:30:15 GMT,
> Kevin Baxter<voidchicken at gmail.com> a ιcrit :
> > $ ls /usr/compat
> > ls: /usr/compat: No such file or directory
> > $ ls -ld /compat
> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jan 17 2010 compat
> > It isn't a symlink on my system. At what point in installation is it
> > supposed to have been created? I don't see a mention of that
> > anywhere in the Handbook. Chapter 11.2 even refers to /compat/linux
> > instead of /usr/compat/linux.
> On 9.0 bsdinstall does not create the /compat symlink. Or
> even /compat, it is created when you install the linux base.
> You have to move /compat to /usr/compat and create the link by hand.
I've checked on 9.0-RC2 and the link is there, but my installs were
upgraded from 8.2-RELEASE, so you may have a point there. I'll check on
a clean 9.0-RC3 install shortly and report findings.
> This is a bug in bsdinstall imho. Sysintall did it. I don't know if
> this is fixed (I've installed with a 9.0 beta usb key)
If it happens that 9.0 installs into /compat, we should either add this
to the documentation or file a PR so that either the linux_base package
or bsdinstall creates the link.
But from the current PR it seems the OP was using 8.2-RELEASE which
should not exhibit this.
More information about the freebsd-doc