sgml entities for CPU architectures?

[Bruce A. Mah]

If memory serves me right, Ben Kaduk wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Bruce A. Mah <bmah at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s
>>>> (somewhat) new daily snapshot
>>>> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64.  Should I just use literals for
>>>> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet?
>>> As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures.
>> The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see
>> src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment).
> 
> But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ?

Ah sorry, I was unclear (no caffeine yet this morning).  What I meant to
say was that the release documents use this set of entities and that if
you want to add entities for doc/ tree documents, using the same names
might be good.  Apologies for the confusion, I'm off to go make some tea
now...

Bruce

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20070922/65712aae/attachment.sig>