docs/102925: Porters hand book: description for repocopy is bit odd

[NAKATA at FreeBSD.org]

>Number:         102925
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Porters hand book: description for repocopy is bit odd
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Sep 05 23:20:17 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     NAKATA, Maho
>Release:        6.1-RELEASE
>Organization:
FreeBSD.org
>Environment:
>Description:
In 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#AEN1365

> When a port has been repo copied:
> 
>    1.  Upgrade the copied port to the new version (remember to change the PORTNAME so there are not duplicate ports with the same name).
>    2. Add the new subdirectory to the SUBDIR listing in the parent directory Makefile. You can run make checksubdirs in the parent directory to check this.
>    3. If the port changed categories, modify the CATEGORIES line of the port's Makefile accordingly
>    4. Add the new module entry to CVSROOT/modules.
>    5. Add an entry to ports/MOVED.

However,

5. is problematic, since in this case we don't need it. At least we need some explanation.

I propose to swich this to: 
5. Add an entry to ports/MOVED, if you remove the original port.

Per Kris, 5 is okay for repo move, though.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: