docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model)

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On 2006-02-10 10:16, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2/10/06, Daniel Gerzo <[1]danger at rulez.sk> wrote:
>>>> -                    For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security
>>>> +                    For slips of time not to become to long with regards to security
>>>>                      and stability issues, extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE.
>>>
>>>  Hmmm, not really.  The original text is ok.  "too long" refers to the
>>>  length of a time period.  I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here.
>>>
>>
>> looks okay to me too.
>
> I guess I should apologize -- I made this diff hastily, and put the
> arguments in the wrong order -- the original text has "to long,"
> I am proposing to change it to "too long".  Unless I'm
> misunderstanding you, here.

Oh crap!  I didn't notice that the filenames were reverse.
No need to apologize at all; it was me being hasty.

Committed now, thanks :)